The 4 Capacities of Living Organization

Peripheral Vigilance

The ability to recognize a change before it becomes a crisis

Peripheral vigilance is the ability to detect subtle signals in the environment before they become visible threats. This approach relies on biological mechanisms documented by neurobiological research.

Scientific foundations

Research on human vision, particularly the work of neurobiologist David Marr at MIT, has shown that our visual system has two modes of operation:

• Central vision for details and peripheral vision to detect movements and changes in the environment.

It is this lateral detection capability that alerts us to potential dangers.

By transposing this principle to organizations, peripheral vigilance consists of developing a collective capacity to detect weak signals that generally escape traditional surveillance systems.

Concrete implementation

Implementing perimeter vigilance within an organization relies on several concrete actions :

• Identifying people naturally attuned to weak signals :

  • sales representatives, technicians, customer-facing staff

• Implementation of simple information feedback channels without administrative burden

• Training in recognizing the types of weak signals relevant to the organization

• Installation of shared dashboards allowing collective visualization of detected signals

Limitations and precautions

Peripheral vigilance is not a magic bullet. It has limitations documented by cognitive science research, notably the risk of information overload and false alarms. That's why we support organizations in implementing systems for filtering and progressively validating detected signals.

Our positioning

We are currently developing peripheral vigilance protocols adapted to different organizational contexts, in collaboration with partner organizations. Our approach is progressive and measured, without promising infallible detection.

The methods we propose are based on validated biological principles, but their application to organizations requires adaptations and concrete testing. We rigorously document these adaptations and their results.

Peripheral vigilance represents a fundamental capacity to anticipate changes in the environment, but its development requires time and methodical implementation.

Organic Adaptation

Organic adaptation does not consist of eliminating hierarchy.

Organic adaptation is the ability of an organization to coordinate its actions effectively without relying exclusively on a centralized hierarchy. This approach is based on coordination mechanisms observed in nature, particularly in social insects.

The basis of this ability lies in the concept of stigmergy, identified and studied by the French biologist Pierre-Paul Grassé in his work on termites and ants. His research, published in the 1950s and 1960s, showed how these insects coordinate their complex actions not through centralized instructions, but through modifications to their immediate environment.

Concrete implementation

Within organizations, we develop this capability through the gradual implementation of protocols that enable :

• The circulation of essential information without mandatory hierarchical channels

• The ability of teams to initiate actions in the face of unforeseen situations

• Continuous adjustment of actions based on feedback from the field

These protocols are co-developed with the teams involved and tested in real-world conditions before being implemented more broadly. Their design takes into account the specific characteristics of each organization and its operational context.

Scientific foundations

Grassé's work has been validated and expanded upon by several decades of research in behavioral biology. Subsequent studies on complex systems have confirmed the relevance of these mechanisms for understanding coordination in different types of organizations.

Our positioning

We are currently working with partner organizations to adapt these principles to different organizational contexts. Our approach is gradual and measured :

• Each protocol is evaluated and adjusted based on the observed results.

We do not promise rapid transformation, but accompany the gradual development of this capacity through successive adjustments based on the observation of real practices.

This capability is integrated with the other dimensions of the existing organization and does not replace hierarchical structures, but complements them for better responsiveness to the unpredictable.

Proactive Resilience

Warning signs are almost always present.

Proactive resilience is an organization's ability to navigate disruptions while strengthening its capacity to meet future challenges. This approach is not about avoiding crises, but about using them to progress.

1. Act before the critical threshold is reached

   In traditional risk management, action is often taken once a crisis has already occurred. Proactive resilience reverses this pattern:

   - it relies on the ability to detect micro-deviations, unusual slowness, a drop in morale, customer silence, and to respond to them immediately, even if they are not yet "provable".

   This requires legitimizing unquantified signals and empowering teams to act without hierarchical approval. This is not improvisation:

   - It is a discipline of early reaction.

   This approach is based on documented work in crisis management :

   - major failures are almost always preceded by weak signals that are ignored (Hervé Lesca & Éric Lesca, Information and Communication Management in Crisis Situations , 2010).

2. Respond locally, without depending on a decision-making center

   In tense situations, every minute counts. Waiting for instructions from the top creates critical delays. Proactive resilience establishes simple, pre-shared protocols that allow field teams to make autonomous decisions.

   These protocols are not detailed scenarios; they would quickly become outdated. They are principles of action :

   - for example, "in case of an anomaly, isolate the area, alert the teams concerned, maintain internal communication".

   Regardless of the nature of the disruption, these rules guide action without confusion.

   This decentralized coordination method is inspired by real biological mechanisms, such as stigmergy, a leaderless coordination method observed in ants, where the environment itself guides collective action (Pierre-Paul Grassé, 1959).

3. Learn from every disruption, without looking for someone to blame.

   After a crisis, the temptation is to look for human error to punish. Proactive resilience offers another way :

   - to understand what the crisis reveals about how the system works .

   This translates into a short, systematic and benevolent ritual, asking three questions :

   What signal could have been detected earlier ?

   Which protocol worked, and which one failed ?

   What simple rule can we add to improve our response next time ?

This process, called "organizational learning", has been documented since the 1970s (Chris Argyris and Donald Schön) and validated in high-risk contexts, such as health or aviation (Karl Weick, Managing the Unexpected , 2001).

Proactive resilience is a collective capacity , cultivated through simple rules, a culture of listening, and a discipline of learning. It does not guarantee the absence of shocks, but it allows us to avoid being destroyed by them .

Active Learning

Active learning is not a method. It is a discipline.

Active learning is the ability of an organization to systematically learn from its experience to sustainably improve its operations. This approach is based on principles documented by research in organizational science and cognitive psychology.

Foundations and Methodology

Studies in the field of aviation safety, particularly ONSUR's work on incident analysis, have demonstrated that the systematic capitalization of lessons learned improves organizational reliability. Active learning is based on these proven principles.

Specifically, we help organizations implement simple processes to :

• Documenting the lessons learned from the situations encountered

• Analyze the root causes of the malfunctions

• Integrating learning into routine practices

• Measuring the impact of the implemented improvements

Practical implementation

The implementation of active learning follows a progressive approach :

1. Establishing regular rituals for analyzing experiences

2. Training teams in objective analysis techniques

3. Creating an accessible organizational memory

4. Regular measurement of the effective application of learning

This approach does not require any major transformation of existing structures. It is gradually integrated into the organization's usual operations.

Transparency about our approach

We are currently developing these methods with partner organizations. The protocols are tested and adjusted based on concrete feedback. We do not promise spectacular results in the short term, but continuous progress through the accumulation of measurable improvements.

Our goal is to help organizations become self-reliant in their ability to learn from their experience, without depending on external stakeholders.

Next step

To schedule this initial exchange, please contact us directly.

👉: Discussing my anticipation challenges